Monday, June 10, 2019

Automobility Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Automobility - Essay ExampleShe also thinks that automobiles enhance knowledge. She says that automobiles take us to all place from watching birds to visiting battlegrounds. She also says that automobiles enhance privacy and allow us control over our immediate environment.The reason why so umteen people are buying cars is because there are benefits in having a car, something that cannot be said about other means of transport. There are unrestricted transportations too such as buses and taxis. However, although these too prolong benefits, they do not provide privacy. Having a private car greatly increases ones mobility. The environmentalists may raise a hue and cry about the ill-effects of the car. But there is little they can do to provide alternatives (Loren Lomasky).Mathew Paterson argues that to explain the rise and subsequent dominance of automobility as a mode of transportation in contemporary societies it is necessary to examine a) the political economy of automobility and b) the cultural politics of automobility. How does Patersons analysis differ from LomaskysMatthew Paterson has used environment and the capitalist structure to highlight the reason for the rise and dominance of automobility. ... In due time the number of cars increased. Today, the population of cars is high enough to warrant their restriction by environmentalists. A richer class of people will by all means buy a car.Paterson emphasizes the centrality of the car to capitalism. Capitalism had major influence in project the value of the car. The capitalist ideology provided the boost to the car industry to evolve through a combination of factors that cover industrialization, taxation, employment and road construction (b) pagan politicsTransportation is not the only need for a car. The basic purpose in owning a car is indeed transportation. However, there is the aura of a culture that has evolved with the automobile. Paterson projects the social, cultural and ability to commute fast i n a car that has shaped the need for a car. Unlike Loren Lomasky, he has not hard on the benefits of the car. He has instead focused on the underlying reasons for the evolution of the car as a necessity rather than a luxury that has make it so ubiquitous today.Paterson says that our dependence on cars must be understood from the culture that we have allowed to take root in our midst. In order to make out environmental issues it is necessary to address this culture and correct the anomalies that have allowed the car to play a dominant role in our affairs (Automobile politics).Several of the authors we have read have argued that is not useful to think about automobile and driver as separate entities. Rather, they argue that we need to think about them as constituting an assemblage, which has also been termed a car-driver, a driver-car, a Carson and several

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.